Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2023-06-25

Re: [PATCH] usb: ohci-at91: Fix the unhandle interrupt when resume

From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: 2023-06-25 13:57:50
Also in: linux-usb, lkml

On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 12:01:12PM +0800, Guiting Shen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 23:52:53PM GMT+8, Alan Stern wrote:
quoted
quoted
The comment which was added with commit-id 0365ee0a8f745 may be outdated
because ohci_suspend() and ohci_at91_port_suspend() is used to suspend
instead of setting ohci->rh_state to OHCI_RH_HALTED.
The comment says nothing about ohci->rh_state; it talks about the 
integrated transceivers and the 48 MHz clock.  I don't see why you would 
think the comment is outdated.
The comment says the reason to discard connection state by reset, but I
don't see any reset operation at ohci-at91 suspend/resume routine in
source code.And ohci_suspend() disable irq emission and mark HW
unaccessible  maybe do the same effect as set ohci->rh_state to
OHCI_RH_HALTED to discard connection state which I think the comment is
outdated.
No, it doesn't do the same.  An actual reset is needed.
quoted
quoted
What's more, I found that only ohci-at91 driver to set the ohci->rh_state
which may be unnessory because the ohci_suspend() disable irq emission and
mark HW unaccessible and ohci_at91_port_suspend() suspend the controller.

Is it really need to set ohci->rh_state in ohci_hcd_at91_drv_suspend()?

It maybe confused to set ohci->rh_state to OHCI_RH_SUSPEND in resume
routine.
I'm not really sure what that assignment was intended to accomplish, but 
maybe it was meant to force a reset when the controller resumes.

You could get the same result by leaving ohci->rh_state set to 
OHCI_RH_SUSPENDED but changing ohci_hcd_at91_drv_resume().  Instead of 
calling ohci_resume(hcd, false), have it call:

	ohci_resume(hcd, !ohci_at91->wakeup);

That way, if the wakeup flag is clear and the clock was stopped, 
ohci_resume() will call ohci_usb_reset().  You should also add a comment 
explaining the reason.

I can't test this because I don't have the AT91 hardware.
It works by your methods to force a reset in my sama5d3 soc hardware.
And I found that the ohci->rh_state was already OHCI_RH_SUSPEND before
set it OHCI_RH_HALTED in suspend.So the question is whether to set it
OHCI_RH_HALETED in ohci-at91 suspend routine.

It also works by comment the ohci->rh_state = OHCI_RH_HALTED in suspend
routine.But I think it is safer to use your methods.

Do you have any suggestion on it before I send v2 patch latter.
No suggestions now.  Submit your v2 patch and then maybe I'll have 
something more to say.

Alan Stern

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help