Re: [PATCH] usb: ohci-at91: Fix the unhandle interrupt when resume
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: 2023-06-25 13:57:50
Also in:
linux-usb, lkml
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 12:01:12PM +0800, Guiting Shen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 23:52:53PM GMT+8, Alan Stern wrote:quoted
quoted
The comment which was added with commit-id 0365ee0a8f745 may be outdated because ohci_suspend() and ohci_at91_port_suspend() is used to suspend instead of setting ohci->rh_state to OHCI_RH_HALTED.The comment says nothing about ohci->rh_state; it talks about the integrated transceivers and the 48 MHz clock. I don't see why you would think the comment is outdated.The comment says the reason to discard connection state by reset, but I don't see any reset operation at ohci-at91 suspend/resume routine in source code.And ohci_suspend() disable irq emission and mark HW unaccessible maybe do the same effect as set ohci->rh_state to OHCI_RH_HALTED to discard connection state which I think the comment is outdated.
No, it doesn't do the same. An actual reset is needed.
quoted
quoted
What's more, I found that only ohci-at91 driver to set the ohci->rh_state which may be unnessory because the ohci_suspend() disable irq emission and mark HW unaccessible and ohci_at91_port_suspend() suspend the controller. Is it really need to set ohci->rh_state in ohci_hcd_at91_drv_suspend()? It maybe confused to set ohci->rh_state to OHCI_RH_SUSPEND in resume routine.I'm not really sure what that assignment was intended to accomplish, but maybe it was meant to force a reset when the controller resumes. You could get the same result by leaving ohci->rh_state set to OHCI_RH_SUSPENDED but changing ohci_hcd_at91_drv_resume(). Instead of calling ohci_resume(hcd, false), have it call: ohci_resume(hcd, !ohci_at91->wakeup); That way, if the wakeup flag is clear and the clock was stopped, ohci_resume() will call ohci_usb_reset(). You should also add a comment explaining the reason. I can't test this because I don't have the AT91 hardware.It works by your methods to force a reset in my sama5d3 soc hardware. And I found that the ohci->rh_state was already OHCI_RH_SUSPEND before set it OHCI_RH_HALTED in suspend.So the question is whether to set it OHCI_RH_HALETED in ohci-at91 suspend routine. It also works by comment the ohci->rh_state = OHCI_RH_HALTED in suspend routine.But I think it is safer to use your methods. Do you have any suggestion on it before I send v2 patch latter.
No suggestions now. Submit your v2 patch and then maybe I'll have something more to say. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel