On 20/06/2023 11:32, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:

quoted

And then we have... existing bindings qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml. Don't create
something similar with difference in the hyphen. Just use device
specific compatible thus device specific filename.

qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml seems to be for ULPI mode phy and the
driver we are introducing is for UTMI. We would have to
modify phy-qcom-usb-hs.c to accomodate M31. Will that be
acceptable to phy-qcom-usb-hs.c owners/maintainers?

We don't talk about drivers here but bindings. Why would you need to
modify the driver when introducing new binding for different device?



Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel