On 04/06/2023 22:20, Maxim Kiselev wrote:
пт, 2 июн. 2023 г. в 11:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski
[off-list ref]:
Hi Krzysztof,
quoted
On 02/06/2023 00:30, Maksim Kiselev wrote:
quoted
From: Maxim Kiselev <redacted>
Allwinner's D1/T113s/R329/T507 SoCs have a new general purpose ADC.
This ADC is the same for all of this SoCs. The only difference is
the number of available channels.
Except that it wasn't tested...
Yes, you are right. I tested it only on the T113s board. And I will be glad if
someone tests it on another SoC.
Please show me the commands how you tested bindings on T113s board. I
really would like to see them...
...
quoted
Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some
warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix.
Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear.
I got a warning about required maintainer property. Should I do
anything with this?
You should do something because sending broken code is not correct.
If yes, then who should be a maintainer?
Someone responsible for this hardware.
...
quoted
Hm? So you do not allow anything from adc.yaml related? Are you sure
this is your intention?
I'm not sure about it. I looked at other ADC bindings and didn't find
another driver with 'additionalProperties: true'
I didn't write about additionalProperties:true, but about missing ref to
adc.yaml.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel