Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: arm64: Use per guest ID register for ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVer
flat view
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-03-27 10:41:32
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 05:06:35 +0000, Jing Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
With per guest ID registers, PMUver settings from userspace can be stored in its corresponding ID register. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <redacted> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 11 +++--- arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 6 --- arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 5 ++- 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index e926ea91a73c..102860ba896d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h@@ -218,6 +218,12 @@ struct kvm_arch { #define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_EL1_32BIT 4 /* PSCI SYSTEM_SUSPEND enabled for the guest */ #define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_SYSTEM_SUSPEND_ENABLED 5 + /* + * AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver was set as ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF + * or DFR0_EL1.PerfMon was set as ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_IMPDEF from + * userspace for VCPUs without PMU. + */ +#define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU 6 unsigned long flags;@@ -230,11 +236,6 @@ struct kvm_arch { cpumask_var_t supported_cpus; - struct { - u8 imp:4; - u8 unimp:4; - } dfr0_pmuver; - /* Hypercall features firmware registers' descriptor */ struct kvm_smccc_features smccc_feat;diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c index c78d68d011cb..fb2de2cb98cb 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c@@ -138,12 +138,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type) kvm_arm_set_default_id_regs(kvm); kvm_arm_init_hypercalls(kvm); - /* - * Initialise the default PMUver before there is a chance to - * create an actual PMU. - */ - kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp = kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(); - return 0; err_free_cpumask:diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c index b60ca1058301..3a87a3d2390d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c@@ -21,9 +21,12 @@ static u8 vcpu_pmuver(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu)) - return vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp; - - return vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.unimp; + return FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), + vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)]); + else if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags)) + return ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF; + else + return 0;
Drop the pointless elses.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
} static u8 perfmon_to_pmuver(u8 perfmon)@@ -256,10 +259,23 @@ static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, if (val) return -EINVAL; - if (valid_pmu) - vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp = pmuver; - else - vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.unimp = pmuver; + if (valid_pmu) { + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
Bingo!
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)] &= + ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer); + vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)] |= + FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), pmuver); + + vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1)] &= + ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon); + vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1)] |= FIELD_PREP( + ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon), pmuver_to_perfmon(pmuver)); + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); + } else if (pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF) { + set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags); + } else { + clear_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags); + }
The last two cases are better written as: assign_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags, pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF);
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
return 0; }@@ -296,10 +312,23 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, if (val) return -EINVAL; - if (valid_pmu) - vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp = perfmon_to_pmuver(perfmon); - else - vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.unimp = perfmon_to_pmuver(perfmon); + if (valid_pmu) { + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
Same here (lock inversion)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1)] &= + ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon); + vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1)] |= FIELD_PREP( + ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon), perfmon); + + vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)] &= + ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer); + vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)] |= FIELD_PREP( + ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), perfmon_to_pmuver(perfmon)); + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); + } else if (perfmon == ID_DFR0_EL1_PerfMon_IMPDEF) { + set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags); + } else { + clear_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_VCPU_HAS_IMP_DEF_PMU, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags); + }
Same here (assign_bit).
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
return 0; }@@ -543,4 +572,14 @@ void kvm_arm_set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm) } kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)] = val; + + /* + * Initialise the default PMUver before there is a chance to + * create an actual PMU. + */ + kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)] &= + ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer); + kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)] |= + FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), + kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit());
Please put these assignments on a single line...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
}diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h index 628775334d5e..51c7f3e7bdde 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h@@ -92,8 +92,9 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); /* * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise. */ -#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu) \ - (vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5) +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu) \ + (FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), \ + vcpu->kvm->arch.id_regs[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1)]) >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5)
I'll stop mentioning the need for accessors... Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel