On 2/27/23 10:08, Alexander Stein wrote:

[...]

quoted

+			sdma2: dma-controller@30e10000 {
+				compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-sdma",

"fsl,imx8mq-sdma";

quoted

+				reg = <0x30e10000 0x10000>;
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 103

IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

quoted

+				clocks = <&audio_blk_ctrl

IMX8MP_CLK_AUDIOMIX_SDMA2_ROOT>,

quoted

+					 <&clk

IMX8MP_CLK_AUDIO_ROOT>;

quoted

+				clock-names = "ipg", "ahb";
+				#dma-cells = <3>;
+				fsl,sdma-ram-script-name = "imx/sdma/

sdma-imx7d.bin";

quoted

+			};
+
+			audio_blk_ctrl: blk-ctrl@30e20000 {

Shouldn't the node name be 'clock-controller@30e20000' as mentioned in the
bindings?
But for the whole series:
Testes-by: Alexander Stein [off-list ref]

It should be clock-controller indeed, fixed in V5, thanks.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel