Re: [PATCH v10 09/26] gunyah: rsc_mgr: Add VM lifecycle RPC
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-21 07:50:56
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-doc, lkml
On 14/02/2023 21:23, Elliot Berman wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add Gunyah Resource Manager RPC to launch an unauthenticated VM. Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <redacted> --- drivers/virt/gunyah/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr.h | 45 ++++++ drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr_rpc.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h | 73 ++++++++++ 4 files changed, 345 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr_rpc.cdiff --git a/drivers/virt/gunyah/Makefile b/drivers/virt/gunyah/Makefile index cc864ff5abbb..de29769f2f3f 100644 --- a/drivers/virt/gunyah/Makefile +++ b/drivers/virt/gunyah/Makefile@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GUNYAH) += gunyah.o -gunyah_rsc_mgr-y += rsc_mgr.o +gunyah_rsc_mgr-y += rsc_mgr.o rsc_mgr_rpc.o obj-$(CONFIG_GUNYAH) += gunyah_rsc_mgr.odiff --git a/drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr.h b/drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr.h index d4e799a7526f..7406237bc66d 100644 --- a/drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr.h +++ b/drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr.h@@ -74,4 +74,49 @@ struct gh_rm; int gh_rm_call(struct gh_rm *rsc_mgr, u32 message_id, void *req_buff, size_t req_buff_size, void **resp_buf, size_t *resp_buff_size);
<----------------------------
+/* Message IDs: VM Management */
+#define GH_RM_RPC_VM_ALLOC_VMID 0x56000001
+#define GH_RM_RPC_VM_DEALLOC_VMID 0x56000002
+#define GH_RM_RPC_VM_START 0x56000004
+#define GH_RM_RPC_VM_STOP 0x56000005
+#define GH_RM_RPC_VM_RESET 0x56000006
+#define GH_RM_RPC_VM_CONFIG_IMAGE 0x56000009
+#define GH_RM_RPC_VM_INIT 0x5600000B
+#define GH_RM_RPC_VM_GET_HYP_RESOURCES 0x56000020
+#define GH_RM_RPC_VM_GET_VMID 0x56000024
+
+struct gh_rm_vm_common_vmid_req {
+ __le16 vmid;
+ __le16 reserved0;
+} __packed;
+
+/* Call: VM_ALLOC */
+struct gh_rm_vm_alloc_vmid_resp {
+ __le16 vmid;
+ __le16 reserved0;
+} __packed;
+
+/* Call: VM_STOP */
+struct gh_rm_vm_stop_req {
+ __le16 vmid;
+#define GH_RM_VM_STOP_FLAG_FORCE_STOP BIT(0)
+ u8 flags;
+ u8 reserved;
+#define GH_RM_VM_STOP_REASON_FORCE_STOP 3
+ __le32 stop_reason;
+} __packed;
+
+/* Call: VM_CONFIG_IMAGE */
+struct gh_rm_vm_config_image_req {
+ __le16 vmid;
+ __le16 auth_mech;
+ __le32 mem_handle;
+ __le64 image_offset;
+ __le64 image_size;
+ __le64 dtb_offset;
+ __le64 dtb_size;
+} __packed;
+
+/* Call: GET_HYP_RESOURCES */
+--------------------------------> All the above structures are very much internal to rsc_mgr_rpc.c and interface to the rsc_mgr_rpc is already abstracted with function arguments ex: int gh_rm_vm_configure(struct gh_rm *rm, u16 vmid, enum gh_rm_vm_auth_mechanism auth_mechanism, u32 mem_handle, u64 image_offset, u64 image_size, u64 dtb_offset, u64 dtb_size) So why do we need these structs and defines in header file at all? you should proabably consider moving them to the .c file.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
#endifdiff --git a/drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr_rpc.c b/drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr_rpc.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4515cdd80106 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/virt/gunyah/rsc_mgr_rpc.c@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright (c) 2022-2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. + */ + +#include <linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h> +
Why new line here?
+#include "rsc_mgr.h" + +/*
...
+int gh_rm_vm_configure(struct gh_rm *rm, u16 vmid, enum gh_rm_vm_auth_mechanism auth_mechanism,
+ u32 mem_handle, u64 image_offset, u64 image_size, u64 dtb_offset, u64 dtb_size)
+{
+ struct gh_rm_vm_config_image_req req_payload = { 0 };
+ size_t resp_size;
+ void *resp;
+
+ req_payload.vmid = cpu_to_le16(vmid);
+ req_payload.auth_mech = cpu_to_le16(auth_mechanism);
+ req_payload.mem_handle = cpu_to_le32(mem_handle);
+ req_payload.image_offset = cpu_to_le64(image_offset);
+ req_payload.image_size = cpu_to_le64(image_size);
+ req_payload.dtb_offset = cpu_to_le64(dtb_offset);
+ req_payload.dtb_size = cpu_to_le64(dtb_size);
+
+ return gh_rm_call(rm, GH_RM_RPC_VM_CONFIG_IMAGE, &req_payload, sizeof(req_payload),
+ &resp, &resp_size);
+}
+--srini _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel