Re: [PATCH v2 13/20] nvmem: core: drop priv pointer in post process callback
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-09 09:08:19
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 09/09/2022 09:58, Michael Walle wrote:
Am 2022-09-09 10:52, schrieb Srinivas Kandagatla:quoted
On 01/09/2022 23:18, Michael Walle wrote:quoted
It doesn't make any more sense to have a opaque pointer set up by the nvmem device. Usually, the layout isn't associated with a particular nvmem device.This is really not a good idea to remove the context pointer, as this is the only way for callback to get context which it can make use of.In which case? As I mentioned it's the priv to the nvmem driver and all the "normal" callbacks can do very little with it. If there will be a future need, then there should be a proper opaque pointer associated with the layout and not the nvmem driver.
Yes, the opaque object here is the layout priv which I agree with, but removing the context totally from the callback is not a good idea. We should have some context to callbacks to be able to allow them to deal with some private info. --srini
-michaelquoted
I would prefer this to be left as it is. --sriniquoted
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <redacted> --- changes since v1: - new patch drivers/nvmem/core.c | 4 ++-- drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c index d31d3f0ab517..6910796937f9 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c@@ -1523,8 +1523,8 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(structnvmem_device *nvmem, nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf); if (cell->read_post_process) { - rc = cell->read_post_process(nvmem->priv, id, index, - cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes); + rc = cell->read_post_process(id, index, cell->offset, buf, + cell->bytes); if (rc) return rc; }diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c index ac0edb6398f1..5e869d4a81c5 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c@@ -222,8 +222,8 @@ static int imx_ocotp_read(void *context, unsignedint offset, return ret; } -static int imx_ocotp_cell_pp(void *context, const char *id, int index, - unsigned int offset, void *data, size_t bytes) +static int imx_ocotp_cell_pp(const char *id, int index, unsigned int offset, + void *data, size_t bytes) { u8 *buf = data; int i;diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.hb/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h index 9d22dc5a3fa5..46067a6a0395 100644--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h@@ -19,8 +19,9 @@ typedef int (*nvmem_reg_read_t)(void *priv,unsigned int offset, typedef int (*nvmem_reg_write_t)(void *priv, unsigned int offset, void *val, size_t bytes); /* used for vendor specific post processing of cell data */ -typedef int (*nvmem_cell_post_process_t)(void *priv, const char *id, int index, - unsigned int offset, void *buf, size_t bytes); +typedef int (*nvmem_cell_post_process_t)(const char *id, int index, + unsigned int offset, void *buf, + size_t bytes); enum nvmem_type { NVMEM_TYPE_UNKNOWN = 0,
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel