Re: [PATCH v1 05/35] drm/connector: Add TV standard property
From: Noralf Trønnes <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-25 15:13:42
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-amlogic, linux-sunxi, lkml
Den 25.08.2022 15.44, skrev Maxime Ripard:
Hi, On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_connector.h b/include/drm/drm_connector.h index 1e9996b33cc8..78275e68ff66 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_connector.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_connector.h@@ -143,6 +143,32 @@ enum subpixel_order { }; +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_NTSC_443 (1 << 0) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_NTSC_J (1 << 1) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_NTSC_M (1 << 2) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_PAL_60 (1 << 3) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_PAL_B (1 << 4) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_PAL_D (1 << 5) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_PAL_G (1 << 6) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_PAL_H (1 << 7) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_PAL_I (1 << 8) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_PAL_M (1 << 9) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_PAL_N (1 << 10) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_PAL_NC (1 << 11) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_SECAM_60 (1 << 12) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_SECAM_B (1 << 13) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_SECAM_D (1 << 14) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_SECAM_G (1 << 15) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_SECAM_K (1 << 16) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_SECAM_K1 (1 << 17) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_SECAM_L (1 << 18) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_HD480I (1 << 19) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_HD480P (1 << 20) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_HD576I (1 << 21) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_HD576P (1 << 22) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_HD720P (1 << 23) +#define DRM_MODE_TV_NORM_HD1080I (1 << 24) +This is an area where DRM overlaps with v4l2, see: - include/dt-bindings/display/sdtv-standards.h - v4l2_norm_to_name() Maybe we should follow suit, but if we do our own thing please mention why in the commit message.Are you suggesting that we'd share that definition with v4l2?
If possible, yes.
I've tried to share some code in the past between v4l2 and DRM, and it got completely shut down so it's not something I'd like to try again, if possible.
But that is a good enough reason not to do so. I just got the impression from some of Laurent's emails a while back that there was some cooperativ atmosphere, but I might be mistaken in my reading/understanding. It is ofc possible to just copy the values from sdtv-standards.h, but I see that hd* is missing from that list, so not sure if there's much point if it has to be extended without changing the source. We can at least use the names from v4l2_norm_to_name(), but from a quick look it seems you already do so. Noralf. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel