Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 5 authors, 2022-07-22

Re: [PATCH 3/4] soc: mediatek: add support of MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP cap

From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Date: 2022-07-21 08:55:56
Also in: linux-mediatek, lkml

Hi Matthias,

sorry, took a long time to respond.

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:20:10PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:

On 30/05/2022 22:42, Fabien Parent wrote:
quoted
From: Alexandre Bailon <redacted>

This adds support of MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP cap.
This is required by the mt8365, for the MM power domain.
Please explain better waht this flag is doing.
I will update the commit message as well.

The flag basically tells the code that there is a strict bus protection
policy in place which means that bus protect release must be before bus
access. This is not on all platforms the case.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <redacted>
---
  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h |  1 +
  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
index 90b91b3b19a8..beaa5785fda2 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
@@ -263,17 +263,36 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
  	regmap_clear_bits(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, PWR_ISO_BIT);
  	regmap_set_bits(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, PWR_RST_B_BIT);
-	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err_pwr_ack;
I think it would help readability if we would enable the clocks only in the
case that MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP) is false. Then we would
only need to add the same if to the error path of err_disable_subsys_clks,
correct?
I already rearranged the code to have a cleaner flow for v2.

Thanks,
Markus
Regards,
Matthias
quoted
+	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP)) {
+		/*
+		 * In few Mediatek platforms(e.g. MT6779), the bus protect
+		 * policy is stricter, which leads to bus protect release must
+		 * be prior to bus access.
+		 */
+		ret = scpsys_sram_enable(pd);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto err_pwr_ack;
-	ret = scpsys_sram_enable(pd);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto err_disable_subsys_clks;
+		ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto err_pwr_ack;
-	ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto err_disable_sram;
+		ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto err_pwr_ack;
+	} else {
+		ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err_pwr_ack;
+
+		ret = scpsys_sram_enable(pd);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto err_disable_subsys_clks;
+
+		ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto err_disable_sram;
+	}
  	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
index a3955d960233..5347471bc3c4 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  #define MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO		BIT(2)
  #define MTK_SCPD_KEEP_DEFAULT_OFF	BIT(3)
  #define MTK_SCPD_DOMAIN_SUPPLY		BIT(4)
+#define MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP		BIT(5)
  #define MTK_SCPD_CAPS(_scpd, _x)	((_scpd)->data->caps & (_x))
  #define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON			0x0210
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help