Re: [PATCH 3/4] soc: mediatek: add support of MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP cap
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Date: 2022-06-09 16:12:31
Also in:
linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi Christophe, On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 07:17:08PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 30/05/2022 à 22:42, Fabien Parent a écrit :quoted
From: Alexandre Bailon <redacted> This adds support of MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP cap. This is required by the mt8365, for the MM power domain. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <redacted> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <redacted> --- drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++------- drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c index 90b91b3b19a8..beaa5785fda2 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c@@ -263,17 +263,36 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) regmap_clear_bits(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, PWR_ISO_BIT); regmap_set_bits(scpsys->base, pd->data->ctl_offs, PWR_RST_B_BIT); - ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks); - if (ret) - goto err_pwr_ack; + if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(pd, MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP)) { + /* + * In few Mediatek platforms(e.g. MT6779), the bus protect + * policy is stricter, which leads to bus protect release must + * be prior to bus access. + */ + ret = scpsys_sram_enable(pd); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_pwr_ack;Hi, with this new path, the error handling path looks odd because the order of operation is not the same.
True, thank you. I am taking over this series and will fix it for v2. Best, Markus
quoted
- ret = scpsys_sram_enable(pd); - if (ret < 0) - goto err_disable_subsys_clks; + ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_pwr_ack;Here...quoted
- ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd); - if (ret < 0) - goto err_disable_sram; + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_pwr_ack;... and here as well. CJquoted
+ } else { + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(pd->num_subsys_clks, pd->subsys_clks); + if (ret) + goto err_pwr_ack; + + ret = scpsys_sram_enable(pd); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_disable_subsys_clks; + + ret = scpsys_bus_protect_disable(pd); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_disable_sram; + } return 0;diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h index a3955d960233..5347471bc3c4 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #define MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO BIT(2) #define MTK_SCPD_KEEP_DEFAULT_OFF BIT(3) #define MTK_SCPD_DOMAIN_SUPPLY BIT(4) +#define MTK_SCPD_STRICT_BUSP BIT(5) #define MTK_SCPD_CAPS(_scpd, _x) ((_scpd)->data->caps & (_x)) #define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON 0x0210
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel