On Tue, 28 Dec 2021, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:

Hi Lee,

quoted

On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:

quoted

On 12/7/21 2:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
[ ... ]

quoted

quoted

It sounded to me like Lee wanted an immutable branch for that

Not exactly, I said:

   "> Suppose we should take patch #2 via [Watchdog] as well.

    If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch."

The alternative is that I take the patch and provide an immutable
branch to you, which I am in a position to do.

I understand, only I am not in a position to take it since my tree
isn't the official watchdog-next tree, and it doesn't show up in -next.
If Wim takes it into the official watchdog-next tree or not would be
completely up to him.

I personally don't care if the bindings check is clean in my inofficial
tree, so maybe this is a non-issue.

That doesn't help, sadly.

I think the best course of action is for Wim to let me know when this
patch makes it into his tree.  I'll take the MFD one at the same time
and the two shall meet in -next.

Honestly, this is all such a faff.

Just to keep a script happy that 3 people care about.

It's going in today.

Also applied.

Thanks Wim.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel