Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-06 18:55:55
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mips, linux-watchdog
On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 12/6/21 1:05 AM, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote:quoted
On 06.12.2021 09:44, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
On Mon, 06 Dec 2021, Rafał Miłecki wrote:quoted
On 15.11.2021 06:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:quoted
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> This helps validating DTS files. Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>I'm not familiar with handling multi-subsystem patchsets (here: watchdog & MFD). Please kindly let me know: how to proceed with this patchset now to get it queued for Linus?What is the requirement for these to be merged together?If you merge 2/2 without 1/2 then people running "make dt_binding_check" may see 1 extra warning until both patches meet in Linus's tree. So it all comes to how much you care about amount of warnings produced by "dt_binding_check".In -next, I don't, but I know Rob gets excited about it. Rob, what is your final word on this? Is it a forced requirement for all interconnected document changes to go in together?The first patch is queued up in Guenter's watchdog tree here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git/commit/?h=watchdog-next&id=a5b2ebc8f6e67b5c81023e8bde6b19ff48ffdb02 and will be submitted to Wim shortly I believe, so I suppose we should take patch #2 via Guenter and Wim's tree as well logically.
If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel