Re: [PATCH 2/4] media: aspeed: Use FIELD_GET to improve readability
From: Jammy Huang <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-22 06:10:21
Also in:
linux-aspeed, linux-media, lkml, openbmc
Hi Joel, OK, I will update in next patch as you advised. Thanks for your review. On 2021/12/22 上午 08:59, Joel Stanley wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 09:53, Jammy Huang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Use the bitfield macro FIELD_GET, and GENMASK to do the shift and mask in one go for reg values. Signed-off-by: Jammy Huang <redacted> --- drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c | 35 ++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c b/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c index d5f77b205175..581a4261f9b7 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c@@ -156,26 +156,22 @@ #define VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_NO_H BIT(13) #define VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_NO_DISP BIT(14) #define VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_NO_CLK BIT(15) -#define VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_RT_SHF 16 -#define VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_RT GENMASK(27, VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_RT_SHF) +#define VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_RT GENMASK(27, 16) #define VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_INTERLACE BIT(31) #define VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET 0x094 #define VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_TOP GENMASK(12, 0) -#define VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_BOT_SHF 16 -#define VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_BOT GENMASK(28, VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_BOT_SHF) +#define VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_BOT GENMASK(28, 16) #define VE_MODE_DETECT_STATUS 0x098 #define VE_MODE_DETECT_H_PERIOD GENMASK(11, 0) -#define VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES_SHF 16 -#define VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES GENMASK(27, VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES_SHF) +#define VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES GENMASK(27, 16) #define VE_MODE_DETECT_STATUS_VSYNC BIT(28) #define VE_MODE_DETECT_STATUS_HSYNC BIT(29) #define VE_SYNC_STATUS 0x09c #define VE_SYNC_STATUS_HSYNC GENMASK(11, 0) -#define VE_SYNC_STATUS_VSYNC_SHF 16 -#define VE_SYNC_STATUS_VSYNC GENMASK(27, VE_SYNC_STATUS_VSYNC_SHF) +#define VE_SYNC_STATUS_VSYNC GENMASK(27, 16) #define VE_H_TOTAL_PIXELS 0x0A0@@ -988,23 +984,24 @@ static void aspeed_video_get_resolution(struct aspeed_video *video) sync = aspeed_video_read(video, VE_SYNC_STATUS); htotal = aspeed_video_read(video, VE_H_TOTAL_PIXELS); - video->frame_bottom = (src_tb_edge & VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_BOT) >> - VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_BOT_SHF; - video->frame_top = src_tb_edge & VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_TOP; + video->frame_bottom = FIELD_GET(VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_BOT, + src_tb_edge); + video->frame_top = FIELD_GET(VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_TOP, + src_tb_edge); det->vfrontporch = video->frame_top; - det->vbackporch = ((mds & VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES) >> - VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES_SHF) - video->frame_bottom; - det->vsync = (sync & VE_SYNC_STATUS_VSYNC) >> - VE_SYNC_STATUS_VSYNC_SHF; + det->vbackporch = FIELD_GET(VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES, mds) - + video->frame_bottom; + det->vsync = FIELD_GET(VE_SYNC_STATUS_VSYNC, sync); if (video->frame_top > video->frame_bottom) continue; - video->frame_right = (src_lr_edge & VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_RT) >> - VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_RT_SHF; - video->frame_left = src_lr_edge & VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_LEFT; + video->frame_right = FIELD_GET(VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_RT, + src_lr_edge); + video->frame_left = FIELD_GET(VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_LEFT, + src_lr_edge);I suggest putting these on one line to further improve readability: video->frame_right = FIELD_GET(VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_RT, src_lr_edge); video->frame_left = FIELD_GET(VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_LEFT, src_lr_edge); The same for the other lines you've changed above. And then add: Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>quoted
det->hfrontporch = video->frame_left; det->hbackporch = htotal - video->frame_right; - det->hsync = sync & VE_SYNC_STATUS_HSYNC; + det->hsync = FIELD_GET(VE_SYNC_STATUS_HSYNC, sync); if (video->frame_left > video->frame_right) continue; -- 2.25.1
-- Best Regards Jammy _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel