On 12/15/21 at 02:28pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 02:55:26PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
quoted
@@ -518,7 +519,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
}
}
- if (crash_base >= (1ULL << 32) && reserve_crashkernel_low()) {
+ if (crash_base >= CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX && reserve_crashkernel_low()) {
memblock_phys_free(crash_base, crash_size);
return;
}
That's not a equivalent transformation on X86_32.
reserve_crashkernel_low() always return 0 on x86_32, so the not equivalent
transformation for x86_32 doesn't matter, I think.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel