On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 6:34 PM Jesse Taube [off-list ref] wrote:

On 11/1/21 16:13, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:40:22AM -0400, Jesse Taube wrote:

quoted

Add i.MXRT documentation for compatible string.

Cc: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
index a90c971b4f1f..4b4340def2aa 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
           - fsl,ls1028a-lpuart
           - fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart
           - fsl,imx8qm-lpuart
+          - fsl,imxrt-lpuart

Actually, 'rt' is not a single part is it? If the variations are same
die, but fused off then no need to distinguish. Otherwise, these should
be SoC specific.

I don't exactly know what "but fused off" means I would assume
disconnected but on-die?

Right. Or not pinned out is another possibility.

The imxrtxxx is a series that has the same UART
controller across them. Should I add ACK?

Looking at the errata docs briefly, there's at least 2 die as some of
the errata docs give the mask id. So they aren't necessarily 'the
same'. You want the compatible strings to be specific enough to handle
any differences or errata. If you only care about the imxrt1050, then
I'd just use that and move on. Otherwise, maybe someone from NXP wants
to comment?

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel