On 11/16/21 17:34, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
- r = num_online_cpus();
+ /*
+ * ARM64 treats KVM_CAP_NR_CPUS differently from all other
+ * architectures, as it does not always bound it to
+ * num_online_cpus(). It should not matter much because this
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS (sorry for the typo in my suggestion). I'll fix it when applying.
Paolo
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ * is just an advisory value.
+ */
+ r = min_t(unsigned int, num_online_cpus(),
+ kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus());
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel