Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 5 authors, 2021-11-17
STALE1664d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)
Revisions (2)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 current

[PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: s390: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by num_online_cpus()

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-11-16 16:36:05
Also in: kvm, kvm-riscv, linux-mips, linux-s390, lkml
Subsystem: kernel virtual machine for s390 (kvm/s390), s390 architecture, the rest · Maintainers: Christian Borntraeger, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Alexander Gordeev, Linus Torvalds

KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS is a legacy advisory value which on other architectures
return num_online_cpus() caped by KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS or something else
(ppc and arm64 are special cases). On s390, KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS returns
the same as KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS and this may turn out to be a bad
'advice'. Switch s390 to returning caped num_online_cpus() too.

Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 6a6dd5e1daf6..1cfe36f6432e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -585,6 +585,8 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
 			r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
 		else if (sclp.has_esca && sclp.has_64bscao)
 			r = KVM_S390_ESCA_CPU_SLOTS;
+		if (ext == KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS)
+			r = min_t(unsigned int, num_online_cpus(), r);
 		break;
 	case KVM_CAP_S390_COW:
 		r = MACHINE_HAS_ESOP;
-- 
2.33.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help