Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 3 authors, 2021-11-10

Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] gpiolib: remove legacy gpio_export

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-11-09 22:48:03
Also in: linux-gpio, lkml

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:42 PM Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:50 AM Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I think the TODO list is in Linus' head,
Oh no, drivers/gpio/TODO
quoted
but it would include all the files
that use one of the interfaces in linux/gpio.h. I found about 350 of them,
so there is little point in listing them one at a time. IIRC Linus is going
through those one subsystem at a time.
Yeah but if it's just me I doubt that I will manage to do it by the
time I retire in 2037 or so... So the TODO is there to inspire others
to step in and help out.
I think at the current rate, it should only take about another ten years: ;-)

$ for i in v3.18 v4.1 v4.4 v4.9 v4.14 v4.19 v5.4 v5.10 v5.15 ; do echo
-n $i\  ;  git grep -wl
'\<\(gpio_direction_input\|gpio_direction_output\|gpio_get_value_cansleep\|gpio_set_value_cansleep\|gpio_get_value\|gpio_set_value\|gpio_to_irq\|gpio_request\|gpio_request_one\|gpio_request_array\)\>\|\<\(ARCH_NR_GPIOS\|GPIOF_DIR_\|GPIOF_INIT\|GPIOF_EXPORT\|GPIOF_OPEN\|GPIOF_IN\|GPIOF_OUT\|gpio_is_valid\\|gpio_free\|devm_gpio_\)'
$i | wc -l ; done
v3.18 676
v4.1 669
v4.4 646
v4.9 639
v4.14 614
v4.19 553
v5.4 465
v5.10 381
v5.15 354

I'm a fan of deconstruction interfaces one function call at a time, which
is different from your one-subsystem at a time approach, but these can
obviously be done at the same time. This 8-patch series is hopefully a good
step in that direction, removing some of the more obscure interfaces
and making the rest a little more obvious.

I've also started a patch series to remove some of the less common
of_gpio portions, which gets rid of of_get_gpio(), of_get_gpio_flags()
and of_get_named_gpio_flags() but leaves of_get_named_gpio() in
place for now. I'm much less confident about that work though, so I
haven't posted that. I think killing off the of_gpio consumer-side
interfaces entirely would likely make the biggest impact, as those
appear to still be used a lot in relatively modern drivers, while the
traditional gpio_request() interfaces are mainly used in drivers for
legacy boards that don't have a long future ahead of them unless
they get converted to DT.

        Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help