Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 5 authors, 2021-10-16

Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] ARM: assembler: introduce bl_r and bl_m macros

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2021-10-05 12:12:44

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:15 AM Ard Biesheuvel [off-list ref] wrote:
Add some macros that abstract the difference between the ways indirect
calls are performed on older and newer ARM architecture revisions.

The main difference is to prefer blx instructions over explicit LR
assignments when possible, as these tend to confuse the prediction logic
in out-of-order cores when speculating across a function return.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
+       .macro          bl_r, dst:req, c
+       .if             __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 6
+       mov\c           lr, pc
+       mov\c           pc, \dst
+       .else
+       blx\c           \dst
+       .endif
+       .endm
I suppose we could use blx on ARMv5 as well, but it wouldn't make a difference
there, right?

        Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help