On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 23:23:52 +0100,
Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

 On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 4:43 PM Marc Zyngier [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip.h b/include/linux/irqchip.h
index ccf32758ea85..146a9d80a6a2 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip.h

@@ -33,7 +33,15 @@ extern int platform_irqchip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev);
 #define IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_BEGIN(drv_name) \
 static const struct of_device_id drv_name##_irqchip_match_table[] = {

-#define IRQCHIP_MATCH(compat, fn) { .compatible = compat, .data = fn },
+/* Undefined on purpose */
+int typecheck_irq_init_cb(struct device_node *, struct device_node *,
+                         struct platform_device *);
+
+#define typecheck_irq_init_cb(fn)                                      \
+       __typecheck(typecheck_irq_init_cb, fn) ? fn : fn

That's nice! Shouldn't it also be used for IRQCHIP_DECLARE?

Absolutely. And enabling this shows that changing of_irq_init_cb_t
breaks *all users* of IRQCHIP_DECLARE(). Not an acceptable outcome
when we're at -rc5.

Why can't the relevant drivers use of_find_device_by_node() instead?
That would allow us to keep the status-quo on of_irq_init_cb_t.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel