Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf arm-spe: Implement find_snapshot callback
From: James Clark <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-12 08:47:35
Also in:
linux-perf-users, lkml
On 12/10/2021 09:19, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:55:37PM +0100, German Gomez wrote:quoted
Hi Leo, On 06/10/2021 10:51, Leo Yan wrote:quoted
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 10:35:20AM +0100, German Gomez wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
So simply say, I think the head pointer monotonically increasing is the right thing to do in Arm SPE driver.I will talk to James about how we can proceed on this.Thanks!I took this offline with James and, though it looks possible to patch the SPE driver to have a monotonically increasing head pointer in order to simplify the handling in the perf tool, it could be a breaking change for users of the perf_event_open syscall that currently rely on the way it works now. An alternative way we considered to simplify the patch is to change the logic inside the find_snapshot callback so that it records the entire contents of the aux buffer every time. What do you think?What does intel-pt do?
Intel-pt has a wrapped head, which is why it has the intel_pt_find_snapshot() function in perf to try to not save any zeros from the buffer that haven't been written yet. (With a wrapped head pointer it's impossible to tell). Coresight has a monotonically increasing head pointer so it is possible to tell. Recently, Leo removed the Coresight version of find_snapshot() for this reason. It would be nice to do the same for SPE because that function has a heuristic and is also slow, but I imagine that not returning wrapped head pointers could break anything that expects them. James
Will
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel