On Mon, 2021-10-04 at 21:03 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:31:20PM +0200, Iwona Winiarska wrote:

quoted

Baseboard management controllers (BMC) often run Linux but are usually
implemented with non-X86 processors. They can use PECI to access package
config space (PCS) registers on the host CPU and since some information,
e.g. figuring out the core count, can be obtained using different
registers on different CPU generations, they need to decode the family
and model.

Move the data from arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h into a new file
include/linux/x86/intel-family.h so that it can be used by other
architectures.

Signed-off-by: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <redacted>
---
To limit tree-wide changes and help people that were expecting
intel-family defines in arch/x86 to find it more easily without going
through git history, we're not removing the original header
completely, we're keeping it as a "stub" that includes the new one.
If there is a consensus that the tree-wide option is better,
we can choose this approach.

Why can't the linux/ namespace header include the x86 one so that
nothing changes for arch/x86/?

Same reason why PECI can't just include arch/x86 directly (we're building for
ARM, not x86).

And if it is really only a handful of families you need, you might just
as well copy them into the peci headers and slap a comment above it
saying where they come from and save yourself all that churn...

It's a handful of families for now - but I do expect the list to grow once new
platforms are introduced (and with that - duplicates have to be added in both
places).

Since the churn is relatively low I wanted to start with trying to keep things
clean first.
If you're against that - sure, we can duplicate. 

Thanks
-Iwona
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel