On 8/19/2021 11:56 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
The PFTF CM4 is an ACPI platform that isn't ECAM compliant. Its config
space is in two parts. One part is for the root port registers and a
second moveable window pointing at a device's 4K config space. Thus it
doesn't have an MCFG, and any MCFG provided would be nonsense
anyway. Instead, a Linux specific host bridge _DSD selects a custom
ECAM ops and cfgres. The cfg op picks between those two regions while
disallowing problematic accesses.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <redacted>
Once you address Bjorn's feedback, feel free to add:
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
I do wonder if squashing patches 2 and 3 would make more sense,
otherwise we have a bcm2711_pcie_ops that is unused in patch 2.
--
Florian
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel