Re: [PATCH v11 08/16] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-08-18 10:57:00
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:42:28AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
As for your other suggestion:quoted
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c@@ -2733,6 +2733,7 @@ static int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked const struct cpumask *cpu_allowed_mask = task_cpu_possible_mask(p); const struct cpumask *cpu_valid_mask = cpu_active_mask; bool kthread = p->flags & PF_KTHREAD; + struct cpumask *user_mask = NULL; unsigned int dest_cpu; int ret = 0;@@ -2792,9 +2793,13 @@ static int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked __do_set_cpus_allowed(p, new_mask, flags); if (flags & SCA_USER) - release_user_cpus_ptr(p); + swap(user_mask, p->user_cpus_ptr); + + ret = affine_move_task(rq, p, rf, dest_cpu, flags); + + kfree(user_mask); - return affine_move_task(rq, p, rf, dest_cpu, flags); + return ret; out: task_rq_unlock(rq, p, rf);@@ -2954,8 +2959,10 @@ void relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(s return; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); - release_user_cpus_ptr(p); + p->user_cpus_ptr = NULL; raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); + + kfree(mask);I think the idea looks good, but perhaps we could wrap things up a bit: /* Comment about why this is useful with RT */ static cpumask_t *clear_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p) { struct cpumask *user_mask = NULL; swap(user_mask, p->user_cpus_ptr); return user_mask; } void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p) { kfree(clear_user_cpus_ptr(p)); } Then just use clear_user_cpus_ptr() in sched/core.c where we know what we're doing (well, at least one of us does!).
OK, I'll go make it like that. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel