Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: Survival kit for SCR_EL3.HCE==0 conditions
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-15 09:27:36
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 08:28:47 +0100, Florian Fainelli [off-list ref] wrote:
On 8/12/2021 9:02 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
Anyone vaguely familiar with the ARMv8 architecture would quickly understand that entering the kernel at EL2 without enabling the HVC instruction is... living dangerously. But as it turns out [0], there is a whole range of (*cough*) "high quality" (*cough*) Broadcom systems out there configured exactly like that.Some Broadcom systems, namely the 4908 and all of those using CFE, they later switched to u-boot and ATF and got it right.
Do we have a list of the affected systems?
quoted
If you are speechless, I'm right with you. These machines have stopped being able to boot an upstream kernel since 5.12, where we changed the way we switch from nVHE to VHE, as this relies on the HVC instruction being usable... It is also worth noting that these systems have never been able to use KVM. Or kexec. This small series addresses the issue by detecting an UNDEFing HVC in a fairly controlled environment, and in this case pretend that we have booted at EL1. It also documents the requirement for SCR_EL3.HCE to be set to *1* if the kernel is entered at EL2. Turns out that we really have to state the obvious. This has been tested on a FVP model with a hacked-up boot-wrapper. Note that I really don't think any of this is -stable material, except maybe for the documentation. It isn't 5.14 material either. Best case, this is 5.15, or maybe even later. If ever.While I am very appreciative of the work you have done here to try to get the dysfunctional systems to warn and continue to boot, I would rather we try to load a minimal shim at EL3 capable of fixing up any incorrect EL3 register setting ahead of loading the kernel provided this is possible at all on a commercially available system.
That would be the best thing to do, and would make the machine fully usable. I still think we need to have something in the kernel to at least let the user know that their system is misconfigured though. If CFE allows a payload to be loaded at EL3 and executed on all CPUs, that would be absolutely awesome. It would even allow switching over to ATF... Thanks, M.
Rafal, is this something that CFE allows you to do (as I could not get a straight answer from that team), if so have you tried it? -- Florian
-- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel