Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: serial: fsl-linflexuart: convert to json-schema format
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-13 11:28:58
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-serial, lkml
On 13/08/2021 13:11, Chester Lin wrote:
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:04:44PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:quoted
On 05.08.21 08:54, Chester Lin wrote:quoted
Convert the FSL LINFlexD UART binding to json-schema. Signed-off-by: Chester Lin <redacted> --- .../bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.txt | 22 --------- .../bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.yaml | 48 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.txt create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.yamlThanks for your effort, Chester.quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.txt deleted file mode 100644 index f1bbe0826be5..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.txt +++ /dev/null@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@ -* Freescale LINFlexD UART - -The LINFlexD controller implements several LIN protocol versions, as well as -support for full-duplex UART communication through 8-bit and 9-bit frames. - -See chapter 47 ("LINFlexD") in the reference manual[1]. - -Required properties: -- compatible : - - "fsl,s32v234-linflexuart" for LINFlexD configured in UART mode, which - is compatible with the one integrated on S32V234 SoC -- reg : Address and length of the register set for the device -- interrupts : Should contain uart interrupt - -Example: -uart0: serial@40053000 { - compatible = "fsl,s32v234-linflexuart"; - reg = <0x0 0x40053000 0x0 0x1000>; - interrupts = <0 59 4>; -}; - -[1] https://www.nxp.com/webapp/Download?colCode=S32V234RMdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..acfe34706ccb --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl,s32-linflexuart.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)Since this is dual-licensed and BSD-2-Clause would seem compatible with GPLv3, this could probably be s/GPL-2.0-only/GPL-2.0-or-later/ ? Not a blocker.There's no license identifier in the original file so it's not a problem to choose "GPL-2.0-or-later".
That is not entirely correct. If there is no explicit license in the file, it's kernel's default so GPL-2.0-only. You cannot relicense derivative work without getting permission from authors and copyright holders. However if you did not copy the text/description from original bindings, your work won't be derivative so you can relicense it. Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel