Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove some unneeded init in arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist()
From: John Garry <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-05 10:22:53
Also in:
linux-iommu, lkml
On 21/06/2021 17:36, John Garry wrote:
Members of struct "llq" will be zero-inited, apart from member max_n_shift. But we write llq.val straight after the init, so it was pointless to zero init those other members. As such, separately init member max_n_shift only. In addition, struct "head" is initialised to "llq" only so that member max_n_shift is set. But that member is never referenced for "head", so remove any init there. Removing these initializations is seen as a small performance optimisation, as this code is (very) hot path.
Hi Will, Any chance you can pick up this small optimisation? Cheers
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: John Garry <redacted>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c index 54b2f27b81d4..8a8ad49bb7fd 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c@@ -727,11 +727,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, unsigned long flags; bool owner; struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; - struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq = { - .max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift, - }, head = llq; + struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq, head; int ret = 0; + llq.max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift; + /* 1. Allocate some space in the queue */ local_irq_save(flags); llq.val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel