Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 3 authors, 2021-08-05
STALE1850d LANDED

Landed in mainline as 5c08c5acdc6c on 2021-08-02.

[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove some unneeded init in arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist()

From: John Garry <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-21 16:46:24
Also in: linux-iommu, lkml
Subsystem: arm smmu drivers, iommu subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Will Deacon, Joerg Roedel, Linus Torvalds

Members of struct "llq" will be zero-inited, apart from member max_n_shift.
But we write llq.val straight after the init, so it was pointless to zero
init those other members. As such, separately init member max_n_shift
only.

In addition, struct "head" is initialised to "llq" only so that member
max_n_shift is set. But that member is never referenced for "head", so
remove any init there.

Removing these initializations is seen as a small performance optimisation,
as this code is (very) hot path.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <redacted>
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 54b2f27b81d4..8a8ad49bb7fd 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -727,11 +727,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool owner;
 	struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
-	struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq = {
-		.max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift,
-	}, head = llq;
+	struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq, head;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	llq.max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift;
+
 	/* 1. Allocate some space in the queue */
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	llq.val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
-- 
2.26.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help