RE: [PATCH V2 5/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: change to ioremap_wc for dram
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Date: 2021-07-14 01:01:30
Also in:
linux-remoteproc
Hi Mathieu,
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: change to ioremap_wc for dram On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 05:40:33PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:quoted
DRAM is not io memory, so changed to ioremap_wc. This is also aligned with core io accessories. e.g. memcpy/memset and cpu direct access. Cc: Bjorn Andersson <redacted> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Fixes: 5e4c1243071d ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: support remote cores booted before Linux Kernel") Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> --- v1->v2: * new patchIt's a new patch and yet Peng's RB tag is already on it...
Aisheng's reply in the other email. " Above two lines were added by mistake. (copied from patch 4) I'm going to wait for review comments first and resend with changes if any. Regards Aisheng "
quoted
--- drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.cb/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index ff620688fad9..4ae416ba5080 100644--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc*priv,quoted
break; /* Not use resource version, because we might share region */ - priv->mem[b].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res.start,resource_size(&res));quoted
+ priv->mem[b].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(&pdev->dev,res.start,quoted
+resource_size(&res));How was it working before?
we took all memory used by M-core as io memory, including TCM/SRAM/DRAM. Will it really work for all platforms and was this
extensively tested?
Aisheng may confirm, I not test this patchset.
Peng - I will need an explicit reply from you that you are in agreement with this change.
I not test, but it should work per my understanding. i.MX TCM area has limitation that not use ioremap_wc, DRAM has no such limitation. Just think this not deserve a fix tag.
I will also need you to review patch 01 and 02 of this set.
Sure, I'll review. Thanks, Peng.
Thanks, Mathieuquoted
if (!priv->mem[b].cpu_addr) { dev_err(dev, "failed to remap %pr\n", &res); return -ENOMEM; -- 2.25.1
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel