Thread (14 messages) flat view 14 messages, 4 authors, 2021-06-10

Re: [PATCH 6/6] pwm: sun4i: don't delay if the PWM is already off

From: Pascal Roeleven <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-10 13:43:02
Also in: linux-pwm, linux-sunxi

On 2021-05-31 06:46, Roman Beranek wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Roman Beranek <redacted>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
index 6ab06b9749d0..88bd90498d1f 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip,
struct pwm_device *pwm,
 
 	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
 
-	if (state->enabled) {
+	if (state->enabled || !cstate.enabled) {
 		mutex_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
 		return 0;
 	}
Btw, this now leaves the gate open if the controller is currently
disabled and we are only changing the period register and staying
disabled. This becomes an issue because we always expect the gate to be
disabled when the controller is disabled.

Regards,
Pascal


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help