Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/1] arm64: Add BPF exception tables
From: Ravi Bangoria <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-22 07:12:07
Also in:
bpf
Hi Alexei, On 6/18/21 10:04 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:58 PM Ravi Bangoria [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
$ dmesg [ 166.864325] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000d12345 [ 166.864336] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 166.864338] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page 0xd12345 is unallocated userspace address. Similarly, I also tried withthat's unfortunately expected, since this is a user address.
Sure. fwiw, it works with bpf_probe_read().
quoted
p->dte = (void *)0xffffffffc1234567 after confirming it's not allocated to kernel or any module address. I see the same failure with it too.This one is surprising though. Sounds like a bug in exception table construction. Can you debug it to see what's causing it? First check that do_kern_addr_fault() is invoked in this case. And then fixup_exception() and why search_bpf_extables() cannot find it.
It seems the commit 4c5de127598e1 ("bpf: Emit explicit NULL pointer checks
for PROBE_LDX instructions.") added few instructions before actual load
but does not consider those additional instruction while calculating
extable offset. Let me prepare a fix.
Separately we probably need to replace the NULL check with addr >= TASK_SIZE_MAX to close this issue though it's a bit artificial.
Ravi _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel