Re: [PATCH v22 09/18] dt-binding: memory: pl353-smc: Convert to yaml
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-09 15:26:55
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 09/06/2021 16:11, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Hi Krzysztof, Rob, Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote on Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:54:19 +0200:quoted
On 09/06/2021 15:34, Miquel Raynal wrote:quoted
Hi Krzysztof, Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote on Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:12:40 +0200:quoted
On 09/06/2021 10:01, Miquel Raynal wrote:quoted
Convert this binding file to yaml schema. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> --- .../memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml | 133 ++++++++++++++++++ .../bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt | 45 ------ 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..1de6f87d4986 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: ARM PL353 Static Memory Controller (SMC) device-tree bindings + +maintainers: + - Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> + - Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> + +description: + The PL353 Static Memory Controller is a bus where you can connect two kinds + of memory interfaces, which are NAND and memory mapped interfaces (such as + SRAM or NOR). + +# We need a select here so we don't match all nodes with 'arm,primecell' +select: + properties: + compatible: + contains: + enum: + - arm,pl353-smc-r2p1That's a const... but also I don't get the need for select.I think this is needed to ensure this binding is not enforced against arm,primecell compatible nodes which are not featuring the arm,pl353-smc-r2p1 compatible.Which seems to be result of unusual compatible match, so once you convert to regular match, this select is not needed.I don't think so, I received a hint from Rob some time ago, he told me to add this additional select line as in all other arm,primecell binding. Rob, any additional info regarding this?
Hmm, I think you' are right. Since arm,primecell is used in many other
compatibles (including ones without schema yet), the select is needed.
In such case the select can be only:
select:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
const: arm,pl353-smc-r2p1
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel