Thread (39 messages) flat view 39 messages, 5 authors, 2021-06-10

Re: [PATCH v22 09/18] dt-binding: memory: pl353-smc: Convert to yaml

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-09 13:54:26
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On 09/06/2021 15:34, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,

Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote on Wed, 9
Jun 2021 14:12:40 +0200:
quoted
On 09/06/2021 10:01, Miquel Raynal wrote:
quoted
Convert this binding file to yaml schema.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 .../memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml     | 133 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt |  45 ------
 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml
 delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1de6f87d4986
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/memory-controllers/arm,pl353-smc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: ARM PL353 Static Memory Controller (SMC) device-tree bindings
+
+maintainers:
+  - Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
+  - Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com>
+
+description:
+  The PL353 Static Memory Controller is a bus where you can connect two kinds
+  of memory interfaces, which are NAND and memory mapped interfaces (such as
+  SRAM or NOR).
+
+# We need a select here so we don't match all nodes with 'arm,primecell'
+select:
+  properties:
+    compatible:
+      contains:
+        enum:
+          - arm,pl353-smc-r2p1  
That's a const... but also I don't get the need for select.
I think this is needed to ensure this binding is not enforced against
arm,primecell compatible nodes which are not featuring the
arm,pl353-smc-r2p1 compatible.
Which seems to be result of unusual compatible match, so once you
convert to regular match, this select is not needed.
quoted
quoted
+  required:
+    - compatible
+
+properties:
+  $nodename:
+    pattern: "^memory-controller@[0-9a-f]+$"
+
+  compatible:
+    oneOf:
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - arm,pl353-smc-r2p1
+          - enum:
+              - arm,primecell  
This looks unusual. Basically you change the bindings, because before
they required "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1", "arm,primecell".
That is precisely what I try to match and I think it works. Perhaps
this version is easier to extend when a new compatible comes in.
However, I am fine using an alternative formula, like below if you
think it's better:

compatible:
  items:
    - const: arm,pl353-smc-r2p1
    - const: arm,primecell
That's the common, easiest and actually expected.
quoted
Don't you want here items:
 - const: ...
 - const: ...
?
quoted
+
+  "#address-cells":
+    const: 2
+
+  "#size-cells":
+    const: 1
+
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: configuration registers for the host and sub-controllers  
Just maxItems. Description is obvious.
I don't think it is that obvious because there are actually 4 areas
and, because of the yaml language, we only describe one in the reg
property while the others and defined in the ranges property, but
that's fine by me, I'll drop the description and stick to a
maxItems entry.
The explanation of all four areas could have sense, but now it states
the obvious - these are configuration registers :)
quoted
quoted
+
+  clocks:
+    items:
+      - description: the clock for the memory device bus
+      - description: the main clock of the controller  
Isn't apb_pclk the bus clock (so second item below)?
The SMC has two clock domains referred as aclk and mclk. In the TRM,
aclk is described as "Clock for the AXI domain". The AXI interface is
used to trigger CMD/ADDR/DATA cycles on the memory bus. There is also
an APB interface used to reach the SMC registers. I *think* that
both APB and AXI domains are fed by the same apb_pclk source but I
might be wrong. Hence memclk would just feed the memory bus that bonds
the memory device (eg. the NAND flash) to the host controller.

This is my current understanding but if you think it works differently
I'm all ears because this part is not 100% clear to me.
I was just wondering... your explanation is fine to me, thanks!


Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help