[PATCH v4 61/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Synchronize PSTATE early on exit
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-05-10 17:48:35
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
Subsystem:
arm64 port (aarch64 architecture), kernel virtual machine for arm64 (kvm/arm64), the rest · Maintainers:
Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Marc Zyngier, Oliver Upton, Linus Torvalds
The NV code relies on predicates such as is_hyp_ctxt() being
reliable. In turn, is_hyp_ctxt() relies on things like PSTATE
and the virtual HCR_EL2 being accurate.
But with ARMv8.4-NV removing trapping for a large part of the
EL2 system registers (among which HCR_EL2), we can't use such
trapping to synchronize the rest of the state.
Let's look at the following sequence for a VHE guest:
(1) enter guest in host EL0
(2) guest traps to guest vEL2 (no hypervisor intervention)
(3) guest clears virtual HCR_EL2.TGE (no trap either)
(4) host interrupt fires, exit
(5) is_hyp_ctxt() now says "guest" (PSTATE.M==EL1 and TGE==0)
It is obvious that such behaviour would be rather unfortunate,
and lead to interesting, difficult to catch bugs specially if
preemption kicks in (yes, I wasted a whole week chasing this one).
In order to preserve the invariant that a guest entered in host
context must exit in the same context, we must make sure that
is_hyp_ctxt() works correctly. Since we can always observe the
guest value of HCR_EL2.{E2H,TGE} in the VNCR_EL2 page, we solely
need to synchronize PSTATE as early as possible.
This basically amounts to moving from_hw_pstate() as close
as possible to the guest exit point, and fixup_guest_exit()
seems as good a place as any.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 16 ++++--
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h | 26 ++--------
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c | 8 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index 0790eb2b7545..6011f32fdb32 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h@@ -408,11 +408,11 @@ static inline bool __hyp_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } /* - * Return true when we were able to fixup the guest exit and should return to - * the guest, false when we should restore the host state and return to the - * main run loop. + * Prologue for the guest fixup, populating ESR_EL2 and fixing up PC + * if required. */ -static inline bool fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code) +static inline void fixup_guest_exit_prologue(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + u64 *exit_code) { if (ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(*exit_code) != ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ) vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ESR);
@@ -431,7 +431,15 @@ static inline bool fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code) if (esr_ec == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32 || esr_ec == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64) write_sysreg_el2(read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR) - 4, SYS_ELR); } +} +/* + * Return true when we were able to fixup the guest exit and should return to + * the guest, false when we should restore the host state and return to the + * main run loop. + */ +static inline bool fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code) +{ /* * We're using the raw exception code in order to only process * the trap if no SError is pending. We will come back to the
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h
index 92715fa01e88..1931c8667d52 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h@@ -51,32 +51,12 @@ static inline void __sysreg_save_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt) ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, SPSR_EL1) = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SPSR); } -static inline u64 from_hw_pstate(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt) -{ - u64 reg = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR); - - if (__is_hyp_ctxt(ctxt)) { - u64 mode = reg & (PSR_MODE_MASK | PSR_MODE32_BIT); - - switch (mode) { - case PSR_MODE_EL1t: - mode = PSR_MODE_EL2t; - break; - case PSR_MODE_EL1h: - mode = PSR_MODE_EL2h; - break; - } - - return (reg & ~(PSR_MODE_MASK | PSR_MODE32_BIT)) | mode; - } - - return reg; -} - static inline void __sysreg_save_el2_return_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt) { + /* On VHE, PSTATE is saved in fixup_guest_exit_vhe() */ + if (!has_vhe()) + ctxt->regs.pstate = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR); ctxt->regs.pc = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR); - ctxt->regs.pstate = from_hw_pstate(ctxt); if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN)) ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, DISR_EL1) = read_sysreg_s(SYS_VDISR_EL2);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
index 2b0f8675fe3b..b9b9c8e0a9f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c@@ -166,6 +166,12 @@ static void __pmu_switch_to_host(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt) write_sysreg(pmu->events_host, pmcntenset_el0); } +static bool fixup_guest_exit_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code) +{ + fixup_guest_exit_prologue(vcpu, exit_code); + return fixup_guest_exit(vcpu, exit_code); +} + /* Switch to the guest for legacy non-VHE systems */ int __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {
@@ -227,7 +233,7 @@ int __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) exit_code = __guest_enter(vcpu); /* And we're baaack! */ - } while (fixup_guest_exit(vcpu, &exit_code)); + } while (fixup_guest_exit_nvhe(vcpu, &exit_code)); __sysreg_save_state_nvhe(guest_ctxt); __sysreg32_save_state(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index 2725dc62ab09..b665a3cc288e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c@@ -154,12 +154,60 @@ void deactivate_traps_vhe_put(void) __deactivate_traps_common(); } +static bool fixup_guest_exit_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code, + bool hyp_ctxt) +{ + u64 pstate = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR); + + /* + * Sync pstate back as early as possible, so that is_hyp_ctxt() + * reflects the exact context. It is otherwise possible to get + * confused with a VHE guest and ARMv8.4-NV, such as: + * + * (1) enter guest in host EL0 + * (2) guest traps to guest vEL2 (no hypervisor intervention) + * (3) guest clears virtual HCR_EL2.TGE (no trap either) + * (4) host interrupt fires, exit + * (5) is_hyp_ctxt() now says "guest" (pstate.M==EL1 and TGE==0) + * + * If host preemption occurs, vcpu_load/put() will be very confused. + * + * Consider this as the prologue before the fixup prologue... + */ + + if (unlikely(hyp_ctxt)) { + u64 mode = pstate & PSR_MODE_MASK; + + switch (mode) { + case PSR_MODE_EL1t: + mode = PSR_MODE_EL2t; + break; + case PSR_MODE_EL1h: + mode = PSR_MODE_EL2h; + break; + } + + pstate = (pstate & ~PSR_MODE_MASK) | mode; + } + + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = pstate; + + fixup_guest_exit_prologue(vcpu, exit_code); + + if (*exit_code == ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP) { + /* more to come here */ + } + + return fixup_guest_exit(vcpu, exit_code); +} + /* Switch to the guest for VHE systems running in EL2 */ static int __kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt; struct kvm_cpu_context *guest_ctxt; u64 exit_code; + bool hyp_ctxt; host_ctxt = &this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt; host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu = vcpu;
@@ -186,12 +234,19 @@ static int __kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) sysreg_restore_guest_state_vhe(guest_ctxt); __debug_switch_to_guest(vcpu); + /* + * Being in HYP context or not is an invariant here. If we enter in + * a given context, we exit in the same context. We can thus only + * sample the context once. + */ + WRITE_ONCE(hyp_ctxt, is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu)); + do { /* Jump in the fire! */ exit_code = __guest_enter(vcpu); /* And we're baaack! */ - } while (fixup_guest_exit(vcpu, &exit_code)); + } while (fixup_guest_exit_vhe(vcpu, &exit_code, READ_ONCE(hyp_ctxt))); sysreg_save_guest_state_vhe(guest_ctxt);
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel