Em Wed, 05 May 2021 14:56:40 +0100
"Rui Miguel Silva" [off-list ref] escreveu:

Hi,
On Wed May 5, 2021 at 12:06 PM WEST, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 5 May 2021 11:41:52 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab [off-list ref] wrote:
 

quoted

The pm_runtime_get_sync() internally increments the
dev->power.usage_count without decrementing it, even on errors.
Replace it by the new pm_runtime_resume_and_get(), introduced by:
commit dd8088d5a896 ("PM: runtime: Add pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal with usage counter")
in order to properly decrement the usage counter, avoiding
a potential PM usage counter leak.

Acked-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>  

Not a fix as far as I can see, just a cleanup - so perhaps not this set?  

yes, the original changelog of this patch, that I acked,  made it
clear it was a cleanup:

"
Commit dd8088d5a896 ("PM: runtime: Add pm_runtime_resume_and_get to
deal with usage counter")                                                                                                                                         
added pm_runtime_resume_and_get() in order to automatically handle 
dev->power.usage_count decrement on errors.

Use the new API, in order to cleanup the error check logic.
"

This one above is new, but I saw Mauro is going change it.

Yes, I'll change the subject/description to the
"use pm_runtime_resume_and_get()" one on this patch, as there's
no issue to be fixed here, just a cleanup ;-)

Sorry for the mess. I did lots of rebase on ~80 patch series
over the last couple of days, based on the reviews (and my own
internal reviews)...

See, the current patchset has ~80 patches with ~30% contained
fixes. It shows that writing a balanced PM runtime code is not
so trivial ;-)

Thanks,
Mauro

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel