Re: [PATCH v16 3/7] soc: mediatek: SVS: introduce MTK SVS engine
From: Roger Lu <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-14 03:10:21
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, linux-pm, lkml
Hi Guenter, Sorry for the late reply and thanks for the notice. On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 21:51 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:54:36PM +0800, Roger Lu wrote:quoted
The Smart Voltage Scaling(SVS) engine is a piece of hardware which calculates suitable SVS bank voltages to OPP voltage table. Then, DVFS driver could apply those SVS bank voltages to PMIC/Buck when receiving OPP_EVENT_ADJUST_VOLTAGE. Signed-off-by: Roger Lu <redacted> --- drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 1 + drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c | 1723 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 1734 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c[ ... ]quoted
+ + svsp_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(svsp->dev->of_node, 0); + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(svsp->dev, svsp_irq, NULL, svs_isr, + svsp->irqflags, svsp->name, svsp);0-day reports: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:1663:7-32: ERROR: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT I would be a bit concerned about this. There is no primary (hard) interrupt handler, meaning the hard interrupt may be re-enabled after the default hard interrupt handler runs. This might result in endless interrupts.
Oh, we add IRQF_ONESHOT in "svs_get_svs_mt8183_platform_data()" for threaded irq. So, please kindly let us know if we need to set more flags or any other potential risks we should be aware. Thanks in advance.
Guenter
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel