Re: [PATCH v14 4/6] locking/qspinlock: Introduce starvation avoidance into CNA
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-13 06:03:16
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-13 06:03:16
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
Alex Kogan [off-list ref] writes:
+ numa_spinlock_threshold= [NUMA, PV_OPS] + Set the time threshold in milliseconds for the + number of intra-node lock hand-offs before the + NUMA-aware spinlock is forced to be passed to + a thread on another NUMA node. Valid values + are in the [1..100] range. Smaller values result + in a more fair, but less performant spinlock, + and vice versa. The default value is 10.
ms granularity seems very coarse grained for this. Surely at some point of spinning you can afford a ktime_get? But ok. Could you turn that into a moduleparm which can be changed at runtime? Would be strange to have to reboot just to play with this parameter This would also make the code a lot shorter I guess. -Andi _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel