Re: [PATCH 5/6] PCI: keystone: Add PCI legacy interrupt support for AM654
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-04-02 11:11:37
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:00:25 +0000, Kishon Vijay Abraham I [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add PCI legacy interrupt support for AM654. AM654 has a single HW interrupt line for all the four legacy interrupts INTA/INTB/INTC/INTD. The HW interrupt line connected to GIC is a pulse interrupt whereas the legacy interrupts by definition is level interrupt. In order to provide level interrupt functionality to edge interrupt line, PCIe in AM654 has provided IRQ_EOI register. When the SW writes to IRQ_EOI register after handling the interrupt, the IP checks the state of legacy interrupt and re-triggers pulse interrupt invoking the handler again. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <redacted> --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c index dfa9a7fcf9b7..84a25207d0d3 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct keystone_pcie { /* PCI Device ID */ u32 device_id; struct device_node *legacy_intc_np; + struct irq_domain *legacy_irq_domain; int msi_host_irq; int num_lanes;@@ -289,6 +290,29 @@ static irqreturn_t ks_pcie_handle_error_irq(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie) return IRQ_HANDLED; } +static void ks_pcie_am654_legacy_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) +{ + struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); + int virq, i; + u32 reg; + + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); + + for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_INTX; i++) { + reg = ks_pcie_app_readl(ks_pcie, IRQ_STATUS(i)); + if (!(reg & INTx_EN)) + continue; + + virq = irq_linear_revmap(ks_pcie->legacy_irq_domain, i); + generic_handle_irq(virq);
I'm on my way to kill irq_linear_revmap(), so I'd rather you didn't add more instances. Consider using irq_find_mapping() instead.
+ ks_pcie_app_writel(ks_pcie, IRQ_STATUS(i), INTx_EN); + ks_pcie_app_writel(ks_pcie, IRQ_EOI, i);
What are these writes for? The first one feels like an Ack, and the second one has EOI written over it. If that's what they are, llease move these to a proper irq_chip structure and use the appropriate flow handler, instead of dummy_irq_chip and handle_simple_irq. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel