Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel?5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 05:22:09AM -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:

----- Original Message -----

quoted

From: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>
To: "CKI Project" <redacted>
Cc: "Jianlin Shi" <redacted>, "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Jianwen Ji" <redacted>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Hangbin Liu" [off-list ref]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 10:43:47 AM
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel	5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:51:04PM -0000, CKI Project wrote:

quoted

Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:

  aarch64:
    Host 1:
       ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test

Hmm, looks like this one actually passed:

https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/datawarehouse-public/2021/03/11/625627/build_aarch64_redhat%3A1119860/tests/Networking_tunnel_geneve_basic_test/9700954_aarch64_1_resultoutputfile.log

or am I looking in the wrong place?

Hi,

the test actually didn't finish but aborted. It's also a bit visible in
the logs you linked as they are cut off after the basic_nic test started.

Ah yes, I missed that it was truncated. Thanks.

I checked the console log and this looks like the issue we just reported
to upstream:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212227

as the test is killed (test timeout) after spamming the console log for
an hour with a message about unregister_netdevice. So it's a bug, just
not arm-tree specific.

Cheers. I don't have anything queued that I would expect to break only a
networing test (more like the machine wouldn't boot if we broke something)
so I'll go ahead with my pull request as planned.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel