❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)

5 messages, 4 authors, 2021-03-15 · open the first message on its own page

❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)

From: CKI Project <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-11 20:53:18

Hello,

We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:

       Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
            Commit: 30b2675761b8 - arm64: mm: remove unused __cpu_uses_extended_idmap[_level()]

The results of these automated tests are provided below.

    Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
             Merge: OK
           Compile: OK
             Tests: FAILED

All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:

  https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/03/11/625627

One or more kernel tests failed:

    aarch64:
     ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test

We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.

Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.

        ,-.   ,-.
       ( C ) ( K )  Continuous
        `-',-.`-'   Kernel
          ( I )     Integration
           `-'
______________________________________________________________________________

Compile testing
---------------

We compiled the kernel for 1 architecture:

    aarch64:
      make options: make -j30 INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 targz-pkg



Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:

  aarch64:
    Host 1:
       ✅ Boot test
       ✅ ACPI table test
       ✅ ACPI enabled test
       ✅ LTP
       ✅ Loopdev Sanity
       ✅ Memory: fork_mem
       ✅ Memory function: memfd_create
       ✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
       ✅ Networking bridge: sanity
       ✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
       ✅ Networking socket: fuzz
       ✅ Networking: igmp conformance test
       ✅ Networking route: pmtu
       ✅ Networking route_func - local
       ✅ Networking route_func - forward
       ✅ Networking TCP: keepalive test
       ✅ Networking UDP: socket
       ✅ Networking cki netfilter test
       ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
       ✅ Networking tunnel: gre basic
       ✅ L2TP basic test
       ✅ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
       ✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - transport
       ✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - tunnel
       ✅ Libkcapi AF_ALG test
       ✅ pciutils: update pci ids test
       ✅ ALSA PCM loopback test
       ✅ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test
       ✅ storage: SCSI VPD
       ✅ trace: ftrace/tracer
       🚧 ✅ i2c: i2cdetect sanity
       🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
       🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
       🚧 ✅ Firmware test suite
       🚧 ✅ jvm - jcstress tests
       🚧 ✅ Memory function: kaslr
       🚧 ✅ audit: audit testsuite test

    Host 2:
       ✅ Boot test
       ✅ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
       ✅ storage: software RAID testing
       🚧 ✅ xfstests - ext4
       🚧 ✅ xfstests - xfs
       🚧 ✅ xfstests - btrfs
       🚧 ✅ IPMI driver test
       🚧 ✅ IPMItool loop stress test
       🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
       🚧 ✅ Storage block - filesystem fio test
       🚧 ✅ Storage block - queue scheduler test
       🚧 ✅ Storage nvme - tcp
       🚧 ✅ Storage: lvm device-mapper test
       🚧 ✅ Storage: swraid mdadm raid_module test
       🚧 ✅ stress: stress-ng

  Test sources: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests
    💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!

Aborted tests
-------------
Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡.
If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that
explicitly in the report.

Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
being fixed.

Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
finished running yet are marked with ⏱.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-03-12 09:45:37

Hi all,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:51:04PM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:

       Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
            Commit: 30b2675761b8 - arm64: mm: remove unused __cpu_uses_extended_idmap[_level()]

The results of these automated tests are provided below.

    Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
             Merge: OK
           Compile: OK
             Tests: FAILED

All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:

  https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/03/11/625627

One or more kernel tests failed:

    aarch64:
     ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
[...]
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:

  aarch64:
    Host 1:
       ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
Hmm, looks like this one actually passed:

https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/datawarehouse-public/2021/03/11/625627/build_aarch64_redhat%3A1119860/tests/Networking_tunnel_geneve_basic_test/9700954_aarch64_1_resultoutputfile.log

or am I looking in the wrong place?

Thanks,

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)

From: Veronika Kabatova <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-12 10:24:47


----- Original Message -----
From: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>
To: "CKI Project" <redacted>
Cc: "Jianlin Shi" <redacted>, "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Jianwen Ji" <redacted>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Hangbin Liu" [off-list ref]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 10:43:47 AM
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel	5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)

Hi all,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:51:04PM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
quoted
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:

       Kernel repo:
       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
            Commit: 30b2675761b8 - arm64: mm: remove unused
            __cpu_uses_extended_idmap[_level()]

The results of these automated tests are provided below.

    Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
             Merge: OK
           Compile: OK
             Tests: FAILED

All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download
here:

  https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/03/11/625627

One or more kernel tests failed:

    aarch64:
     ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
[...]
quoted
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:

  aarch64:
    Host 1:
       ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
Hmm, looks like this one actually passed:

https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/datawarehouse-public/2021/03/11/625627/build_aarch64_redhat%3A1119860/tests/Networking_tunnel_geneve_basic_test/9700954_aarch64_1_resultoutputfile.log

or am I looking in the wrong place?
Hi,

the test actually didn't finish but aborted. It's also a bit visible in
the logs you linked as they are cut off after the basic_nic test started.

I checked the console log and this looks like the issue we just reported
to upstream:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212227

as the test is killed (test timeout) after spamming the console log for
an hour with a message about unregister_netdevice. So it's a bug, just
not arm-tree specific.

@Jianwen, please correct me if there's a different problem with the
test run that I didn't recognize.


Thanks,
Veronika

Thanks,

Will


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel?5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-03-12 11:07:22

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 05:22:09AM -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
----- Original Message -----
quoted
From: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>
To: "CKI Project" <redacted>
Cc: "Jianlin Shi" <redacted>, "catalin marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "Jianwen Ji" <redacted>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Hangbin Liu" [off-list ref]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 10:43:47 AM
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel	5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 08:51:04PM -0000, CKI Project wrote:
quoted
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:

  aarch64:
    Host 1:
       ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
Hmm, looks like this one actually passed:

https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/datawarehouse-public/2021/03/11/625627/build_aarch64_redhat%3A1119860/tests/Networking_tunnel_geneve_basic_test/9700954_aarch64_1_resultoutputfile.log

or am I looking in the wrong place?
Hi,

the test actually didn't finish but aborted. It's also a bit visible in
the logs you linked as they are cut off after the basic_nic test started.
Ah yes, I missed that it was truncated. Thanks.
I checked the console log and this looks like the issue we just reported
to upstream:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212227

as the test is killed (test timeout) after spamming the console log for
an hour with a message about unregister_netdevice. So it's a bug, just
not arm-tree specific.
Cheers. I don't have anything queued that I would expect to break only a
networing test (more like the machine wouldn't boot if we broke something)
so I'll go ahead with my pull request as planned.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel?5.12.0-rc2 (arm-next)

From: Hangbin Liu <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-15 01:55:52

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 05:22:09AM -0500, Veronika Kabatova wrote:
quoted
quoted
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:

  aarch64:
    Host 1:
       ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
Hmm, looks like this one actually passed:

https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/datawarehouse-public/2021/03/11/625627/build_aarch64_redhat%3A1119860/tests/Networking_tunnel_geneve_basic_test/9700954_aarch64_1_resultoutputfile.log

or am I looking in the wrong place?
Hi,

the test actually didn't finish but aborted. It's also a bit visible in
the logs you linked as they are cut off after the basic_nic test started.

I checked the console log and this looks like the issue we just reported
to upstream:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212227
cc lxin@ who is familiar with sctp and dev usage count issue.

Thanks
Hangbin
as the test is killed (test timeout) after spamming the console log for
an hour with a message about unregister_netdevice. So it's a bug, just
not arm-tree specific.

@Jianwen, please correct me if there's a different problem with the
test run that I didn't recognize.


Thanks,
Veronika

quoted
Thanks,

Will


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help