Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 7 authors, 2021-04-01

Re: [PATCH v8 3/6] stack: Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall

From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-31 22:39:21
Also in: linux-hardening, linux-mm, lkml

On Wed, Mar 31 2021 at 14:54, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 09:53:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Mar 30 2021 at 13:57, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
+/*
+ * Do not use this anywhere else in the kernel. This is used here because
+ * it provides an arch-agnostic way to grow the stack with correct
+ * alignment. Also, since this use is being explicitly masked to a max of
+ * 10 bits, stack-clash style attacks are unlikely. For more details see
+ * "VLAs" in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
+ * The asm statement is designed to convince the compiler to keep the
+ * allocation around even after "ptr" goes out of scope.
Nit. That explanation of "ptr" might be better placed right at the
add_random...() macro.
Ah, yes! Fixed in v9.
Hmm, looking at V9 the "ptr" thing got lost ....
+/*
+ * Do not use this anywhere else in the kernel. This is used here because
+ * it provides an arch-agnostic way to grow the stack with correct
+ * alignment. Also, since this use is being explicitly masked to a max of
+ * 10 bits, stack-clash style attacks are unlikely. For more details see
+ * "VLAs" in Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
+ */
+void *__builtin_alloca(size_t size);
+/*
+ * Use, at most, 10 bits of entropy. We explicitly cap this to keep the
+ * "VLA" from being unbounded (see above). 10 bits leaves enough room for
+ * per-arch offset masks to reduce entropy (by removing higher bits, since
+ * high entropy may overly constrain usable stack space), and for
+ * compiler/arch-specific stack alignment to remove the lower bits.
+ */
+#define KSTACK_OFFSET_MAX(x)	((x) & 0x3FF)
+
+/*
+ * These macros must be used during syscall entry when interrupts and
+ * preempt are disabled, and after user registers have been stored to
+ * the stack.
+ */
+#define add_random_kstack_offset() do {					\
Do you want to take this via -tip (and leave off the arm64 patch until
it is acked), or would you rather it go via arm64? (I've sent v9 now...)
Either way is fine.

Thanks,

        tglx

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help