On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 11:45, Adrien Grassein [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
I would assume this goes from PMIC, so check your schematics. There is
little point in adding a fixed regulator which is non-controllable.
No, the 1.8V is issued directly from the alimentation stage.
So we can't control it.
quoted
I think bindings don't require it.
After reading some code, I can say that vqmmc is not mandatory but it
helped to find out
the caps of the mmc host. In this case, we only support 1.8V on vqmmc.
It avoids driver to guess it (and avoid bad behaviour on any future change).
If the supply (hardware) is really 1.8 V then indeed your approach is
good. So let's keep that one.
To be sure to understand well: should I keep the fixed regulator?
Thanks,
Yes, keep it, at least I am fine with it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel