On 19-02-21, 09:44, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
On Friday 19 Feb 2021 at 10:28:23 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
quoted
The very core routines (cpufreq_freq_transition_end() and
cpufreq_driver_fast_switch()) of the cpufreq core call
arch_set_freq_scale() today and this isn't going to change anytime
soon. If something gets changed there someone will need to see other
parts of the kernel which may get broken with that.
Yes, but it won't really be straightforward to notice this breakage if
that happens, so in my opinion it was worth to keep that condition.
Right, but chances of that happening are close to zero right now. I
don't see any changes being made there in near future and so as we
agreed, lets leave it as is.
Btw, thanks for your feedback, it was indeed very valuable.
--
viresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel