Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-02-18 08:28:08
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On 17-02-21, 11:57, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
See a very useful comment someone added recently :) : """ + /* + * We don't need to handle CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY event as the AMU + * counters don't have any dependency on cpufreq driver once we have + * initialized AMU support and enabled invariance. The AMU counters will + * keep on working just fine in the absence of the cpufreq driver, and + * for the CPUs for which there are no counters available, the last set + * value of freq_scale will remain valid as that is the frequency those + * CPUs are running at. + */ """
Lol... -- viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel