Hi,
Thanks for your review.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:32:09AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 4:03 AM Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -384,6 +398,16 @@ spi6: spi@28146000 {
#size-cells = <0>;
status = "disabled";
};
+
+ piether: ethernet@28000000 {
+ compatible = "toshiba,visconti-dwmac";
Shouldn't there be a more specific compatible string here, as well as the
particular version of the dwmac you use?
I rechecked the code again based on your point.
I need to specify the version of dwmac. I also noticed that it could
remove some unnecessary code. I will fix this.
In the binding example, you list the device as "dma-coherent",
but in this instance, it is not marked that way. Can you find out
whether the device is in fact connected properly to a cache-coherent
bus?
Note that failing to mark it as cache-coherent will make the device
rather slow and possibly not work correctly if it is in fact coherent,
but the default is non-coherent since a lot of SoCs are lacking
that hardware support.
Thanks for point out.
This hardware does not require dma-coherent. I will remove dma-coherent from DT
binding document.
Arnd
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel