Re: [PATCH 03/13] opp: Keep track of currently programmed OPP
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-01-25 03:13:40
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-01-25 03:13:40
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On 22-01-21, 17:31, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
This may not be true for all kinds of hardware, a display controller is one example. If display's pixclock is raised before the memory bandwidth of the display's memory client, then display controller may get a memory underflow since it won't be able to fetch memory fast enough and it's not possible to pause data transmission to display panel, hence display panel may get out of sync and a full hardware reset will be needed in order to recover. At least this is the case for NVIDIA Tegra SoCs.
Hmm, but I expected that the request for more data will only come after the opp-set-rate has finished and not in between. May be I am wrong. There is nothing wrong in doing it the regulator way if required.
I guess it's not a real problem for any of OPP API users right now, but this is something to keep in mind.
Sure, I am not against it. Just that we thought it isn't worth the code. -- viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel