On Tuesday 12 Jan 2021 at 08:10:47 (-0600), Rob Herring wrote:

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:51 AM Quentin Perret [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Monday 11 Jan 2021 at 08:45:10 (-0600), Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 6:16 AM Quentin Perret [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Introduce early_init_dt_add_memory_hyp() to allow KVM to conserve a copy
of the memory regions parsed from DT. This will be needed in the context
of the protected nVHE feature of KVM/arm64 where the code running at EL2
will be cleanly separated from the host kernel during boot, and will
need its own representation of memory.

What happened to doing this with memblock?

I gave it a go, but as mentioned in v1, I ran into issues for nomap
regions. I want the hypervisor to know about these memory regions (it's
possible some of those will be given to protected guests for instance)
but these seem to be entirely removed from the memblocks when using DT:

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/of/fdt.c#L1153

EFI appears to do things differently, though, as it 'just' uses
memblock_mark_nomap() instead of actively removing the memblock. And that
means I could actually use the memblock API for EFI, but I'd rather
have a common solution. I tried to understand why things are done
differently but couldn't find an answer and kept things simple and
working for now.

Is there a good reason for not using memblock_mark_nomap() with DT? If
not, I'm happy to try that.

There were 2 patches to do that, but it never got resolved. See here[1].

Thanks. So the DT stuff predates the introduction of memblock_mark_nomap,
that's why...

By reading the discussions, [1] still looks a sensible patch on its own,
independently from the issue Nicolas tried to solve. Any reason for not
applying it?

I'll try to rework my series on top and see how that goes.

Thanks,
Quentin

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/1562920284-18638-1-git-send-email-karahmed@amazon.de/ (local)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel