Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues
flat view
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-01-08 09:23:05
Also in:
linux-ext4, linux-toolchains, lkml
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:20:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:37 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
quoted
So, do we raise the minimum gcc version for the kernel as a whole to 5.1 or just for aarch64?I'd personally love to see gcc-5 as the global minimum version, as that would let us finally use --std=gnu11 features instead of gnu89. [There are a couple of useful features that are incompatible with gnu89, and gnu99/gnu11 support in gcc didn't like the kernel sources]
+1 for raising the tree-wide minimum (again!). We actually have a bunch of work-arounds for 4.9 bugs we can get rid of as well. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel