Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-01-08 09:14:37
Also in:
linux-ext4, linux-toolchains, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2021-01-12 · Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- 2021-01-12 · RE: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues · David Laight <hidden>
- 2021-01-12 · Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues · Florian Weimer <hidden>
- 2021-01-07 · Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues · Florian Weimer <hidden>
- 2021-01-06 · Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues · Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:27:22AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
I will note that RHEL 7 uses gcc 4.8. I personally don't have an objections to requiring developers using RHEL 7 to have to install a more modern gcc (since I use Debian Testing and gcc 10.2.1, myself, and gcc 5.1 is so five years ago :-), but I could imagine that being considered inconvenient for some.
The kernel minimum (4.9) is already past that, so RHEL7 people are already out in the cold. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel