Re: [PATCH 4/9] iio: adc: at91_adc: rework trigger definition
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Date: 2020-11-14 19:17:07
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iio, lkml
On 14/11/2020 17:02:30+0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:26:45 +0100 Alexandre Belloni [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Move the available trigger definition back in the driver to stop cluttering the device tree. There is no functional change except that it actually fixes the available triggers for at91sam9rl as it inherited the list from at91sam9260 but actually has the triggers from at91sam9x5.Is that a fix we might want to backport? If not we should probably put a clear statement in here to avoid it getting picked up by the bot. I'd argue it's to invasive a change to backport.
Nobody ever complained about it so I don't think it is necessary to backport. Anyway, the proper backportable fix would be to simply change the device tree, that avoids the driver change which I also think is too invasive. I'll include the DT change in v2. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel